This isn’t the interesting, focussed blog you might have been looking for…

"Pica Pica" has replaced my old blog at google, but without the dharma related material, which has gone to the chagchen site under the DangZang title, and without the translation material, which is now at my work site.

Oh yes, it's by Alex Wilding

Archive

Categories

  • Stomach ulcers amongst Tibetan monks
    Coincidentally this article is from the ABC and refers to people in Sydney! http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/content/2010/s2915471.htm Not astounding, but interesting all the same. […]
  • Slow activity
    Yes, things have been very slow here. I’ve been preparing to move across the world again, and the move is now due to happen in the next few days. I should resurface in the “land of the moon”, Lunigiana, the northern tip of Tuscany, in one or two weeks time, and I hope that things will […]
  • Is Buddhism changing, and is that a corruption?
    Recently I was asked: Do you think that Tibetan Buddhism (and Buddhism) have been corrupted by Western influences? It seems like most Westerners interpret, or want to interpret, Buddhism as a religion with a much more social-activist and political bent. This is probably partly because most Westerners are pretty ignorant of Buddhism. However, as Westerner [.. […]
  • The wheel of life and death
    Tony Blair from top to bottom […]
  • Karmapa’s visit to Europe
    This news is well-known now, but I wanted to add my enthusiasm: http://www.karmapa-in-europe.net/ […]
  • Apple connives with the PRC government
    Dalai Lama purged from Apple apps in China […]
  • “Faith Traditions”- what?
    "Faith tradition" emasculates spirituality […]
  • Why am I not excited?
    His Holiness the Dalai Lama is in Sydney […]
Wednesday November 21st, 2007. Posted by Alex:

Bring they back!

Non-gender-specific third persons

He or she, it or they? Call me old-fashioned but I find a lot of attempts to write or speak in gender-neutral language tend to range between the ugly and the comical. Recently I saw ‘… and if anyone transgress this vow, may the wrathful deity split his or her head into seven pieces!’. But there is no need for it!
I was brought up to look down on the use of ‘they’ as a non-specific pronoun. And while some of the attempts to be gender-neutral may be too ugly for me to be willing to use, I’m well aware that we really want and need to use gender-non-specific language much more these days than we did decades ago. The use of ‘they’ does the job, but it is deprecated as ‘uneducated’.
But hey! They fooled us again! Just like the grammarians tried to tell us that split infinitives were un-English (by which they really meant “unlike Latin”), they tried to tell us that the ‘singular they’ is un-English. Despite having been used since at least the late 1300s, by such writers as Jane Austen: Geoffrey Chaucer, Edmund Spenser, William Shakespeare, the King James Bible, The Spectator, Jonathan Swift, Daniel Defoe, Frances Sheridan, Oliver Goldsmith, Henry Fielding, Maria Edgeworth, Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, William Makepeace Thackeray, Sir Walter Scott, George Eliot [Mary Anne Evans], Charles Dickens, Mrs. Gaskell, Anthony Trollope, John Ruskin, Robert Louis Stevenson, Walt Whitman, George Bernard Shaw, Lewis Carroll, Oscar Wilde, Rudyard Kipling, H. G. Wells, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Edith Wharton, W. H. Auden, Lord Dunsany, George Orwell, and C. S. Lewis.
Deprecated starting in the late 18th or early 19th century, the loss of a gender-non-specific pronoun has been a problem ever since.

Leave a Reply